I just bought a home in Michigan that was foreclosed. I have since found out that the previous owners bought this property in late 2006 in the amount of $175,000. At some point the property, appraised over $200,000 while in their possession. During this time I can clearly see they have made a few updates before going into default. November 2007 the mortgage lender foreclosed and it was sold at Sheriff’s Auction to another bank for $113,000 and that bank then went through court proceedures to evict the owners by March 2008. In this time frame, the home owner completely destroyed the home by:
[ ] removing all fixtures: (toilet, sinks, lights, outlets)
[ ] cutting all the electrical wiring in numerous places (and just left the wire hanging),
[ ] destroyed the garage area and broke rafters,
[ ] taking down all the mini blinds to threw them on the garage floor,
[ ] ripped the door knobs from the doors (completely destroying the doors)
[ ] then threw the door knobs on the floor,
[ ] ripping out the baseboard heaters leaving gaping holes in the floors and walls,
[ ] sawed off all the copper plumbing, tearing out drywall to get to it.
The bank that won the auction ended up listing the home for a jaw dropping $33,000! Mr. AngryHomeOwner went through an awful lot of hard work to throw this temper tantrum after paying $175,000 just the year before and my questions are this:
IS THERE ANY ADVANTAGE WHATSOEVER for this type of temper tantrum on the house owner in default was about to vacate? Obviously he needed to vent some frustration but does he GAIN anything from this type of behavior? Obviously the bank will now get a fraction of what they paid at auction at a massive $80,000 loss from just a few months ago. Who does this financially hurt? Him or the bank? Can this guy be held financially responsible for his destruction to the now bank owned property he was living in? Does the rightful owner, the bank, have a right to go after this guy for thier loss? Or does the bank just chalk this up to a "bad investment" and the home owner gets away with this vandalism free and clear? If this is the case why would a bank (or anyone) bid on a foreclosed home at auction with this type of considerable risk?
Can anyone help me understand when the ramifications of this type of behavior would be? What would keep everyone from gutting their own homes when faced with eviction from foreclosure?
I know there are several question here to be answered but I’m at a complete loss as to why someone would do this and at what cost they face for doing such a thing….
To Oh Yea:
Yes, you are corrrect —- however this questions isn’t addressing what I have to pay for repairs. I am aware of the great bargain I stumbled upon. My question is WILL THIS GUY be held responsible by the bank for his damage he inflicted on this house and their loss because of HIS actions???
To v.b.
You say he should be sued. I think I agree but would the bank actually go though that process or just chalk it up to as loss and bad investment? Why would banks bid on foreclosure auction if people can do this and get away with it????
SIMPLIFIED QUESTION:
I guess the question really is:
if a guy was down on his luck and about to lose his home to foreclosure, what would deter him from making a few bucks by ripping out all the fixtures and copper to sell on the street? Exactly WHAT does this guy have to lose at this point?
I agree with the person who says that foreclosure laws EXPECT adult behavior but desperate times call for desperate means — this guy was either extremely ticked off or was completely desperate for some cash…. but that wouldnt explain why the senseless vandalism to the doors and electric wiring. I am just wondering what can happen to this poor schmuck for taking out his frustrations on this house!
I guess it’s anyone’s guess.
TO iluvmyson6:
You hit the head on the nail! I was speaking to a friend at work who told me that he has heard of something called "foreclosure shopping." NOt what you might think. A group of guys will cruise the "nicer" neighborhoods and look for the tell-tale orange foreclosure sticker you often see on the window or door of a vacant home. They then walk in and help themselves to whatever they need. OR strip the place and list the items on Craigslist. THIS is what has become of the American dream.
With that said. I highly doubt theives would have wasted their time unbolting miniblinds to throw on the floor or cut wires and leave them hanging.
But I hear ya! No wonder this country is in trouble….
TO Apple Pie:
What are you getting at in referance to mortgage insurance? Or did you mean Home Owners Insurance? For me to file a claim for repairs would be fraud. I purchased the property AS-IS which means I knew before I bought it that it was in a state of disrepair. HOWEVER, your parents WOULD have a claim for repairs their renter inflicted since they owned the property at the time the damage was done…. Good luck to you.
TO Oh yea:
I can empathize his sadness at having to leave his home of just over one year… but I STILL just cannot understand what would make a person DESTROY his once lovely home.
Still looking for the answer to what will the bank do to this guy who just cost them a cool $80 grand over an inmature temper tantrum?
Like many have said in their answers: It was HIS home when he destroyed it. I know that I would not allow my mortgage lender to tell me which cabinets to install or which fixtures to tear out. And they could not tell me that I cannot rip out my miniblinds and dance a little happy dance on them in the middle of my garage floor while slicing all the electrical wiring to the beat of the music.
So I guess when the bank bid on the property at sheriff’s auction, they purchased it at $113,000 AS-IS which I guess means: AS-IS = destroyed. In hopes that the guy would have left it in livable condition.
ALSO- How could the bank/legal owner PROVE that it wasn’t theives that did the damage to this home after Mr. HomeOwner vacated the property? Right?
This seems to make sense. Anyone have any other opinion on this subject? I’m surios to hear from you!
I’ve heard that a lot of people are doing this (gutting) to their homes for some profit before they are foreclosed. I saw this same problem on the news last night. I had found a gorgeous home that was in foreclosure and was selling at $95,000 but it was gutted. It all just sucks!